Migrations
Headless & composable
Design & growth
The manual steps gone from the processes that touch revenue, built on the tools you already pay for, so nothing new has to be bought or learned to get the first result.
Trusted by
Somebody is tired of copying data between two tools, so that gets automated first. It works, everyone is pleased, and the business is no better off, because that task was costing three hours a week and nothing else. Meanwhile the form on the website still emails a shared inbox, and the lead that came in on Friday gets a reply on Tuesday.
The expensive manual steps are almost never the annoying ones. They are the handoffs between teams, where nobody owns the gap and nobody is counting what falls into it.
So we start by finding which gaps cost money, and the first thing we automate is usually the one nobody had on the list.
What happens in the minutes after somebody submits a form. Routed to the right person, in the CRM, acknowledged, and counted, so the conversion you paid for does not sit in an inbox over a weekend.
The approvals, onboarding steps, status updates and reports that currently run on somebody remembering to do them.
The tools you already pay for, connected properly, with the data staying consistent between them rather than drifting apart.
Where off-the-shelf automation stops, including the steps that need judgment rather than rules.
Built for companies with a process that runs today on people remembering, enough volume that the gaps cost real money, and no appetite for a six-month platform migration to fix it.
The same automation, two different motives.
We build software, not only automations. Two of our own products run on the Webflow Marketplace, ConsentBit and AccessBit, which means when the right answer is custom rather than a connector we can say so and then build it.
How the work actually flows today, where it stalls, and what each gap costs
What to automate in what order, with the payback stated, and what to leave alone
Built on your tools, tested with real data, with error handling and alerts
Documentation, owner training, and somebody watching for silent failures
Phase 01 maps what happens now rather than what the process document says, because those two are rarely the same.
Tell us where the work stalls. We will tell you what the gap is probably costing you and whether it is worth automating at all.
Nine of the ten results above this page will tell you which tool to buy. Here is the part they skip.
The expensive failures happen between teams, not inside them. A task that annoys one person costs hours. A handoff nobody owns costs deals.
If you are spending on traffic, lead flow is almost always the fastest payback, because the conversion has already been paid for and is being lost after the fact. Everything else competes for second place.
Automation hardens whatever it touches. If the process is under review, fix the process first or you will pay twice.
Steps where somebody genuinely decides something should stay manual, with the data gathered for them automatically. Automating the decision itself is where these projects lose people’s trust.
Every automation fails eventually, usually when an upstream tool changes. What matters is whether somebody finds out that day or at the end of the quarter.
How to find the handoffs costing you money: where to look for the gaps, what to count, how to estimate what each one costs, and which ones to leave alone.
The checks, nothing else.
“We originally hired Seattle New Media to build a complex, layered resource page to assist our users and intuitively drive them to additional content...”
“We needed our webflow website built in a really short timeline and Seattle New Media was able to work within not only our time constraints but...”
“Partnered with Seattle New Media on a project and they were awesome. Super collaborative, tons of experience, just overall a great...”
“Seattle New Media has helped us revamp our website and increase online traffic with Sharpspring CRM, Social Media Marketing, Search Engine...”
Taking the steps that currently run on somebody remembering to do them and making them happen on their own. In practice that is usually a handoff between two systems or two teams, rather than one big process replaced end to end.
Whichever ones fit, and we do not resell any of them. In practice that is usually Zapier, Make, n8n, Airtable or a direct API integration, sometimes custom code. The tool is the last decision, not the first.
It depends on how many processes and how messy the systems are, and the honest answer is that the first conversation is about whether it pays back at all. What moves the number: how many processes, how many systems involved, whether the data is clean, and whether you need somebody monitoring it afterwards.
Yes, and it is usually where we start. Form submission to the right owner, into the CRM, acknowledged and counted, with the drop-offs visible. If you are spending on traffic, this is almost always the fastest payback. Webflow SEO services →
Usually not. Most of what we build runs on tools companies already pay for, and part of phase 01 is finding out what you already own.
It gets caught, because error handling and alerts are built in rather than added after the first silent failure. Whoever owns the process finds out the same day.
Yes, for the steps where rules are not enough, such as summarizing, classifying or drafting. We are deliberately careful about automating decisions rather than the work around them.
Yes. That page is Webflow connected to other systems. This is process automation across the business, whether or not Webflow is involved. Webflow integrations →
You do, along with the documentation and the accounts they run in. The handover is built so your team can change them without us.
Describe the process that currently runs on somebody remembering. You will get a straight answer on what the gap is costing you, what to automate first, and whether it is worth doing at all.
Reviewed by a strategist, not a salesperson.
